BioShock™

BioShock 1 — это прекрасная художественная критика и деконструкция объективизма Айн Рэнд. Игра показывает, к чему может привести мир без моральных и социальных ограничений, где во главу угла поставлены культ гения, прибыль и личная свобода любой ценой. Атмосфера разрушенного утопического города, образ Эндрю Райана и постоянно ощущаемый конфликт идеалов и реальности до сих пор воспринимаются свежо и мощно. На мой взгляд, BioShock заслуживает своей популярности, сегодня всё ещё отлично играется — и как шутер, и как философская притча, — я однозначно рекомендую её к покупке всем, кто ценит сильный сюжет и атмосферу.

Verdadeira obra de arte, a trilogia compensa e muito! Jogão!

Peak game Story hits much harder now that you're older Game runs surprsingly on modern systems without any headache and has controller support

Eu joguei o remaster antes de jogar o original, e pra falar a verdade gostei muito mais de jogar a versão original! Jogo espetacular, revolucionário para sua época. História é seu ponto forte na minha opinião, mas as mecânicas de evolução do personagem e itens também são interessantes e te fazem explorar cada canto do mapa. É um clássico 10/10

The game worked fine (occasional crashes but restarting the game resolved them) until I got to Fort Frolic. Once I got to taking elevator to Sander Cohen, I attempted to save the game which resulted in a game crash. Since then the game started to crash after only a few seconds of playing it (just moving around or traveling to a different map or using any vending machine or saving game or loading game - absolutely anything can crash the game now). Even the old saved games started to crash. Many many many attempts to resolve it produced no solution or even progress toward solution. Horrible... UPDATE: installed Windows updates, upgraded GPU drivers, rebooted, stopped saving the game in the open areas of Fort Frolic (where the light shines from above). The game still crashes every 2-3 minutes, but at least one can make some progress.

megusto mucho okm me hice el finalmalo porq lenetapatineta si keria todo el edam y.asi matarme.atodos jejeje ok pero si peeak de juego lorecomiendo

A fun and immersive experience. (No spoilers in this review) Great story with an interesting story and lore, all the little things around the map like diaries and environmental storytelling is great immersive gameplay. (also the voice acting is phemomenal) The gameplay and gunplay is pretty good too even now, the different weapons that are completely different then the other and not just a slight stat change is great with different Ammo types is fun and give variety. Also the mechanic and ADAM and plasmids are a pretty unique mechanic for a game like this and heavily spices up gameplay and matchups, and I am a sucker for games with looting systems and scarce rescources. Overal a fun and unique experience that still holds to this day. The only thing I don't like really is how the final cutscene immediately cuts off to the dingy and empty main menu screen (maybe something happened or I pressed something Idk) kinda ruined the moment for me just a little. Other then that you should 100% try this game out if like a story driven, action packed, immersive looter-shooter (kinda like fallout).

This game is MID. BioShockingly mediocre. Probably also one of the most overrated games that I've played. It's not the earth-shattering mind-blowing masterpiece that game journalists in 2007 would have told you (but would you seriously trust game journalism to begin with?). At best BioShock is a sub-par FPS. Graphically it was quite good for it's time, the story writing, setting, world building and voice acting is incredible. But none of that matters when the gameplay itself is just kinda... boring. The guns don't feel good and they're underpowered, most enemy encounters are not particularly interesting, and the only unique or innovative thing that BioShock does gameplay-wise is the Plasmid system, which are basically your character upgrades and special abilities. And then there's the Vita-Chamber system. It's a checkpoint system that somehow fell flat on it's face. In most games, like Halo for instance, it would make a checkpoint autosave right before an enemy encounter. If you died during the battle, the entire gamestate would be reverted back to when the checkpoint was made. This means that the player has to actually make the effort to survive and win. But in BioShock, it respawns you but it doesn't revert the gamestate. This removes all and any tension out of every enemy encounter in the game. Lure splicers/big daddies near the chamber, try to shoot them, die, respawn, finish them off. And even when you don't lure 'em in, there's still basically no consequence for dying. That is how you NOT do difficulty in video games. And somehow the wrench is more powerful and reliable than the other weapons in the game? The entire combat gameplay loop is just shock enemy with electro bolt, run up to them, mindlessly wack them with the wrench, repeat until they die. This doesn't apply to the Big Daddies because they are instead bullet sponges that take forever to kill. Which would be fine... if the Vita-Chamber mechanic did not exist. Big Daddies should be the mini-bosses that test your skill, but again there is no consequence for dying so it basically just becomes a shoot-die-respawn-repeat slogfest. The main two things that matter in this game are fun and challenge. But this game is neither fun or challenging. And it's not because this game is old, either. There are other FPS games that came out the same year as this game that are superior. Half-Life 2 Episode Two, Halo 3, Team Fortress 2, and even Metroid Prime 3. All four of those games are great, expecially H3 and TF2 when it comes to gameplay.... now that I think about it, comparing BioShock to Halo 3 is a really dumb and unfair comparison. But even a whole decade before this we were getting games like Quake 2 which came out in 1997. Now THAT was a great FPS. I wish I could give this game a rating that isn't just "positive" or "negative", something inbetween like a "mixed" review. This game nails everything BUT the gameplay. Great story and graphics, but gameplay? BOOOOOORING. And I wonder why this game got so much praise to begin with... maybe IGN or whoever was paid a large sum of money to say meaningless good things about this game in order to drive sales (which is what i assume happens with most critically acclaimed games these days, yes Expedition 33 i'm looking at you), or game journalists just like really mediocre games. Which is also probably true. At most this game is like a 6.5/10. Not the 90/100 or whatever like how Metacritic would tell you. I see this game get bundled up with these other "half-likes" a lot, those being games being similar to or inspired by Half-Life.... Why not just play Half-Life?? Expecially the first one as that has the better gameplay. This game was appearently also supposed to be the spiritual successor to the System Shock series, which even though I haven't played SS1 or 2, or the remake, I would still like to imagine that that game is not as bad or at least not as overrated as BioShock is. ...Or maybe I just don't "get" BioShock. Maybe I'm missing something. In that case, [i] would you kindly [/i] tell me what it is that I don't understand or am missing, or even argue against me about why this game is a ""masterpeice"". For now though, 6.5/10

>peak >thing to do check list >take down a arrogant rich guy >take down a child abuser >now boot up bioshock