Cubic Odyssey

У МЕНЯ ВОПРОС К ТЕХНАРЯМ ИГРЫ- ВЫ МЛЯ ЧТО ТАМ КУРИТЕ, ПОДЕЛИТЕСЬ!!!!! Поясню. В системных требованиях, что написано в стиме... только поддержка винды....КХМ, мля... захожу в линукс минт стима, спокойно устанавливаю эту ИГРУ и.... нифига НИРАЗУ не вылетает ошибка и НЕ выкидывает с игры, и НЕТ черного экрана с перезапуском! Так тогда ВОПРОС: ТАК почему в Винде ВЕЧНО эти ошибки с черным экраном, с перезапуском игры, и невозможностью ИГРАТЬ в КУПЛЕННУЮ игру на ВИНДЕ????? КОМП один с двумя операционками, так что не надо писать, что..... то там.

Cubic Odyssey is one of those games that frustrates me because there is clearly a much better game buried inside it. I have spent more than 50 hours playing it and never completely lost the desire to keep playing. The freedom to build bases, modify ships, explore planets and create my own way of playing is genuinely enjoyable, and building is easily one of the strongest parts of the experience for me. It is not revolutionary, but the freedom works. Unfortunately, the longer I played, the more obvious it became that the game has the foundations for something great without the development and polish necessary to make those foundations work consistently. Progression is one of the biggest problems. My issue is not simply that it is slow, but how often it makes me repeat the same resource loops to move forward. You constantly need more materials and higher-tier resources from different planets and systems, without always getting new mechanics that make obtaining them more interesting. This becomes even more noticeable in co-op, where several players increase resource consumption. Light Shards make this worse, since dealing with corruption requires materials that are expensive and time-consuming to produce. The game keeps extending the amount of work required without giving the player enough meaningful changes to the gameplay in return. Exploration suffers from a similar problem. The idea of a huge galaxy with different planets, danger levels, technology, corruption and resources is excellent, but the variety is not. Many planets and points of interest start feeling repetitive, and there are not enough ways to understand what a planet actually contains before travelling there and searching through it. I expected exploration to be a major strength, but the scale is not always matched by the content. This is difficult to justify when No Man's Sky already exists. At some point I started asking myself: why would I play this when I can play No Man's Sky instead? Cubic Odyssey has its own building system, but it does not develop its exploration enough to make its galaxy feel as meaningful as it should. The story also ended up being much more linear than I expected. The main objective is to save the princess, but the game keeps placing smaller objectives between me and that goal. To reach the Queen's planet, I had to clear the corruption from four planets and complete several objectives. There, I had to repair and activate towers and use them against the red cube. Finally, after reaching the Queen, the game introduced corrupted Dark Keys hidden inside marked red globes. These keys had never appeared during my playthrough and suddenly existed specifically to free the princess. The game then gives me a cutscene and sends me towards another journey. At that point, I simply stopped. After finally reaching the objective the game had been building towards, it immediately created another huge objective involving the rest of the galaxy and its temples. If that was the endgame, I would have preferred the story to build towards it naturally instead of extending it after the main objective had been reached. Ship building is where the technical problems become especially difficult to ignore, because it is also one of the mechanics I enjoyed the most. To modify a ship visually, I have to travel to a space station and use the machine that opens ship building mode. Large ships are scaled down to fit inside the station, and this also affects the building process. The ship can look correctly proportioned while I modify it, yet at normal scale the proportions can be different enough to cause problems. In my case, areas that looked perfectly usable in ship building mode became so tight afterwards that I had to crouch to move through them. When the purpose is to design your own ship, the editor needs to represent the final result accurately. Then there is the memory leak, which is the most serious technical problem I encountered. It is particularly noticeable in ship building mode, especially when placing and removing blocks. The game's memory usage can start around 15 GB and climb towards 18 GB before producing a Fatal Error and crashing. It becomes worse because there is no way to save inside ship building mode. I have to leave it before saving, so a crash can erase everything built since the previous save. This is not minor when ship building is one of the game's main mechanics. The same type of memory problem had already been reported by players in 2025, including cases involving systems with 64 GB of RAM, and I was still experiencing it in 2026. I also saw unusually high memory usage during normal gameplay, with total system usage reaching around 27 GB. That makes the problem even harder to dismiss as something limited to the editor. Other problems become more significant when they accumulate. If a cargo module is full and I remove it from the ship, the items are dropped onto the ground without properly warning the player. I also had an item disappear after a backpack/workbench interaction. These problems add no difficulty or depth; they simply make inventory and progress less reliable. Co-op has its own problems as well. Most of my sessions were playable, but I eventually encountered serious desynchronization. A friend's ship was not appearing where it actually was, while two copies of his ship appeared somewhere else. Those ships could still be entered and interacted with even though he was elsewhere. It did not happen in every session, but it shows the shared world can stop matching the players' state. In a game built around playing together, that is a serious problem. Space combat itself can be satisfying, but its progression does not always make sense. As enemies become stronger, my own ship can feel weaker despite having better equipment. I was using a Titan, a huge ship that should naturally feel durable, yet there were encounters where I could be almost destroyed immediately. The combat is also fairly basic, and I do not always feel stronger at the same rate as the enemies. The creatures across the planets have a similar lack of refinement. Many look goofy and poorly designed, sometimes making the alien designs more interesting than the wildlife. Even the pirate outposts show this lack of polish. These locations contain chests that normally require specific keys, but I found a bug where capturing the outpost before interacting with the chests let me open them without the required keys. This is not a major problem and actually gives the player an advantage, but after this much time, finding bugs that allow progression requirements to be bypassed reinforces the feeling that some systems were never properly finished or maintained. And that is ultimately what frustrates me most about Cubic Odyssey. The game has many good ideas that never received enough development. I understand why players like it, because I liked much of it myself. But when I see community requests for improvements dating back to launch while problems and missing quality-of-life features remain, I cannot escape the feeling that Cubic Odyssey was simply left behind. It could have become a really good game with more work on its systems, progression, exploration, technical problems and quality of life. Instead, it constantly reminds me what it could have been. When the alternative is No Man's Sky, with its much more developed space exploration, it becomes difficult to justify spending my time here simply because the foundation is interesting. Even Starfield would be preferable to me at this point. Not because Cubic Odyssey has nothing good to offer, but because it never develops its best ideas far enough. There is a fun game here, but there is also a huge amount of potential that was never properly used. Score: 4/10 (1) Trash(2) Horrible(3) Very Bad(4) Bad(5) Average (6) Fine(7) Good(8) Very Good(9) Great(10) Masterpiece