HUMANKIND™

Please fix this game. After needing a couple of times to get to know the game, I was finally in a game that seemed to run well, my cities grew, everything was going into the right direction, until someone declared war on me. And there is no way to end this war, I can't even surrender because they didn't reach anything that was worth something but neither can I just stall the war, so now my cities become rebellious and I cannot do anything anymore. A pity because overall, Humankind feels quite like a good game but as long as there a gamebraking bugs, I won't keep playing.

finally picked this up during a Steam sale after having it on my radar for a long time. My main concern coming in was that changing cultures every era would destroy any sense of national identity or familiarity with your empire. ​In practice, the system works brilliantly. Because victory is driven by total Fame—the cumulative impact your civilization leaves on history—you aren't locked into a single rigid path. In Civ VI, your choice of leader often forces you into one or two specific victory conditions from turn 1. In Humankind, combining culture traits across eras makes your playstyle far more versatile and responsive to how the match unfolds. ​Bottom line: Civ VI feels like a digital board game with predefined rules designed for competitive multiplayer with friends. Humankind feels like writing an evolving story in a living world, making it a significantly better single-player sandbox experience.

Fantastic 4x, still getting used to it, some mechanics make no sense (yet). Early game is phenomenal, end is a bit of a drag.

Куча людей сравнивает эту парашу с цывой, а потом еще и палец вверх ей ставит! Не, ну если сравнивать с последними (цывами), то может и так, но если сравнивать с истоками - хотя бы с 4-5-ми частями, то эта поделка лучше только тем, что камера не улетает в время боя к союзнику. Тут наитупейший переход с сдедующие эпохи - нужно набрать определенное кол-во звезд (за экспансию, за науку, за бои и тд), никакущая дипломатия, в частности ведение войны - у бота уже ничего нет, он все потерял, а капитулировать его заставить нельзя, и мир он не принимает, а в твоем городе из-за войны назревает восстание, ну это ж бред. Разработчики даже не додумались нормально сделать зоны контроля, вроде бы они есть, но ходить мимо врагов можно куда хочешь и сколько хочешь, в итоге нахрен идет расстановка войск, нужно учитывать лишь непроходимые участки и дальность стрельбы. Миникарта - это тоже утеренная технология древности. Пока что единственный плюс от игры в такое - это то, что очень быстро хочется срать, учитывайте это при покупке, приятной игры!

Игра жутко несбалансированная, но тем не менее сильно затягивает своей атмосферой. Например если ты раньше всех выбрал культуру Масаев то дальше просто можно всех захватить и выиграть. С другой стороны если комп уходит по науке вперед то ничего ты ему сделать не можешь. В общем баланса нет, очень многое зависит от случайности, но игра все равно затягивает

Я хотел дать шанс игре. Сыграл не в один десяток партий. Старался подмечать плюсы и интересные решения в игре, но, всё равно, сколько бы поблажек не давал. Эта игра - отвратительный кусок дерьма. Куча глюков, которые херят твою партию и вынуждают начинать сначала. Почти невозможный кооператив, где по пол часа надо танцевать с бубном и приносить жертвы не пойми каким богам, чтобы всё заработало как надо и не вылетело. Ну, и конечно же святой рандом неадекватной войны, как в первых цивах, где дубинщик мог убить танк, а потому что потому. Хороший в игре лишь визуал и саунд. Но на деле, повторюсь, кусок говна в красивой конфетной обертке.

This game has some things that sets it apart from, but none that really make it a 'better' experience. It's about the same overall, aside from the start being a bit more active/interactive. Rather than founding a city, you move around and hunt things for food. Trying to get enough to make additional units, then an outpost, then upgrade the outpost to a city. That's definitely the best part about this game. But that mechanic goes away the moment you found a city, making it just like Civ after that. Combat is definitely one of the worst aspect of this game in my opinion. Reinforcements are finnicky when YOU try to have them, but AI gets to pull them in no problem. Defending a city can be impossible unless you leave units on the city at all times, units that are directly beside the city don't count for reinforcements when defending against a siege. Wonders are okay, cool mechanic of building around them, but it definitely feels like there's a billion things to build and by the time you get to a certain point it feels like you shouldn't build a city for the pure purpose of getting a tech later that would literally be faster than building your city now, as when you get that tech, you'll get most of the 'starter' buildings. Wonders can be co-build by many cities, which I think is great. City-States are okay, not equivalent to Civ, but not worse. Easily merge them into your empire late game. Most of the choices you make in the game are obvious in what you 'should' pick if you were a ruler IRL. Those choices are obvious for anyone that has morals overall, but I don't think it should affect the game negatively in the way that it does. Don't want to regulate industry? All your cities stability goes down for 10 rounds because a second ship sunk. Want to enslave the people that invaded and pillaged your cities? Woah there buddy, there's gonna be a revolt in your cities for that. Want to enslave the people that commit violent crimes in your cities and cause stability loss? Revolt part two, electric boogaloo. Child Labor? Children die and cause stability loss every now and again. Too many Immigrants and you want to maintain your isolationist policy? Woah there buddy, we were FOUNDED by settlers, how dare you...take this stability loss. Take over someone capital and change the style to fit your empire's theme? Stability-b-gone because of the riots. There's 'open' paths for the empires, sure, but it's clear there's specific routes they want you to take. If there isn't an event because of a civic you take, there sure will be a sassy remark from the narrator. Obviously some of these are reasonable outcomes regardless of the foundation of the civilization, enslavement, child labor, and equal rights. But the way the events are worded, despite your civ's choices so far just don't make any of them seem 'real' I guess. Isolationists would absolutely consider some invaders as sub-humans. Egalitarians would accept nothing less than equal rights for all. But the options are usually presented in a black/white manner, which make it seem that there is only negative and neutral outcomes. I don't mean to argue for ANY real life scenarios of the things I mentioned, obviously, but just for the game. It doesn't make sense for every Civ to have the same mannerisms and morals. Overall I still had fun in the games I played, and recommend it to fans of the genre, but catch it on a sale. DLC doesn't change much too btw so catch those on a souper sale. Rough start, decent middle, expected late game. 6.5/10

背景：文明6重度PVP玩家(5000小時) 評價：點子很新鮮，但重玩性拉垮，所以樂意買新作，但不樂意買DLC 文明6我是反過來，重玩性有模組扛起來，但沒新點子沒必要出7代，所以我有補六代DLC但七代連基底都沒買 先說優點，遊戲很積極去嘗試解決一些文明重度玩家長期批判遊戲自身的機制問題，誠意很足，不像旁邊文明跟P社每代幾乎只會換皮。 而且這些點子都很新鮮，你要是只玩試玩30回合你肯定挑不出甚麼毛病。 但這些點子終究還是經不起新玩家的考驗，後期機制設計也挻偷懶的，我認識的文明6重度玩家都同一個意見，沒打征服是因為AI對爆兵的理解殘障，飛天的流程都是錘滾錘滾科滾科，最多爭論一下有沒有必要滾人口。由於裸種飛天幾乎每回合都是在舖學院，後期區域量大於質，都是在加法沒有機制做乘法，也就市政樹有給%數，所以到中期開始都沒做區域規劃。中期開始只有產能+科技+兵種有差，變相就只需要考慮種這三種數值相關的東西，而且同類之間的東西很好分優劣，就更沒意思了。 我在這個2026年初這個時間點看這遊戲挻惋惜的，要是這遊戲做好中後期機制，肯定有模組開發組願意微調幫忙整活了，偏偏就不長腦子搞了些賣不出去的換皮DLC。

Does not support local multiplayer or "hotseat" mode, meaning you cannot play with multiple people on a single PC