Field of Glory: Empires

Each in the currency that store quoted — not converted: the gap between two rows is the publisher's pricing, not an exchange rate.

Every market we collect.

Reviews, worldwide (the counter carries no country): 0.29/day in the week to Jul 23 → 0/day in the week after.

For scale, across Steam · Top Sellers · Brazil over the last 30 days: the 26 chart moves that followed a price cut of more than 20% went a median of 7 places towards #1, and the 2,400 moves with no price cut behind them went 2 away. One store, one chart, one country — it is the only place we have enough observations to say even that.

Prices outside the United States have been collected since 6 August 2026 and chart positions since 19 July 2026, so a cut older than that has no market to compare and a market that joined later has no history yet. Nothing here is converted between currencies.

Hours played at review time, across 44 reviews with recorded playtime.

positive critical· bar length = how often the theme comes up

Ever wanted to play Civ in a certain Era? Ever played a Paradox title and thought to yourself "Jee I wish it had Total War battles in it, it would be perfect!" Well, look no further. With just this game you can already achieve the former, and with this game plus Field of Glory II, you can achieve the latter. It is a bit complex to start off with, but not as opaque as the game might seem itself to be. This is where if you ever played a 4x game like Civ or Endless, the muscles regarding population, building, output, and imperial planning comes. Similarly to Civ, you can plan out your provinces in different ways, from being self sustaining far off colonies to an autarchic core 'tall' provinces; you can even mix and match, with having a dedicated Imperial core providing you with culture and military, and a variety of clients and small colonias. In fact, take it from me, you do not want to expand so fast. As the game has a great system that I am now mad Paradox Grand Strategy does not, that being an elegant decadence system based on your cultural output as opposed to a variety of factors from your ruler bonus/malus to your financials to the size of your empire. I am pleasantly surprised to see this also works for AI as well. In my later Cyrenica game at the Rise of Persia start, I had a scary expanding Carthage that somehow managed to steamroll across North Africa in a few turns. In any other 4x, such a snowball would be near impossible overcome, but as I come to find out, due to the rapid expansion AI had done, Carthage had turned from a highly centralized and populous core in Tunis to a chaotic mess of rebelling provinces that stretched entirety of Carthaginian military like butter on too much toast. In one war all the gains they had collapsed. Very fun thing is sometimes rebels will form their own nations. So if you have Field of Glory II, this turns into a more in depth Rome: Total War. 100% Recommended even just this game for the civilization building feeling of it! P.S. If the developers are reading this. I am really enjoying Kingdoms as well. But for the realizable mid to late future, are you guys thinking about merging these two games? I think the fact of having own both but more than that exit from one enter to other, even though really fast comparatively, is I think a big impediment on that sort of experience you guys are trying to give us.