Warhounds

bardzo fajna modernowa wersja x-coma

Granted, I am just a few hours in, but MAN. There has been a looooong dry spell between Jagged 2 and Jagged 3. JA3 is absolutely GOD tier. Probably my favorite PC game ever. I have also been an XCOM player ever since the game that started it all and it was actually called UFO. It is so rare to find good TBS titles. I mean, over 30 years you can count them on one hand. Is this game perfect? No. Is it as good as XCOM2 or JA3? Well, that will depend on your preferences. I am shocked that for a more "budget game" it comes this close. There is no doubt that I will sink countless hours into this and I can't wait to see how the game evolves, both in its campaign, as well as with DLC. So glad I found this. And what a time to be alive. Both warhounds and Z-Com launching the same month? Guess I won't be sleeping much...

Excellent game play like X-com series. This is the Africa version of X-com 2. One of the best turn based tactics game.

我十分珍惜现在市面上的每一款全新的回合制战棋游戏，因为今天，这类游戏已经几乎销声匿迹了。这篇好评当然是希望开发商能够获得更多销量，来反过来促进这一类游戏的诞生。 但总体而言，《战犬》只是一款[b]7/10[/b]左右的回合制战棋游戏。本作是否是进化版的《XCOM2》？我无法确定。但在《XCOM2》已经推出了十几年的今天，这或许并非一种夸赞。我会推荐极其钟爱战棋类游戏的玩家购买，但如果你对战棋类游戏的兴趣没有那么强烈，不妨看到底再做决定。 优点： [list] [*]游戏中的佣兵各自的职业区分度非常高，这是这款游戏的最大特点。近战士兵的必杀，远程狙击手对整体战略的影响，辅助兵几乎无限的奶量与强大的辅助技能，爆破兵的不讲道理的引爆汽车……你一定能够找到你喜欢的职业并加以培养，这是角色自定义游戏最好的一点了。 [*]整体的游戏难度比较宜人，当然，我是以为标准难度爱好者。本作没有所谓的“粪怪”，即使是后期高攻高防的Quad 9战士，也有高贵的近战士兵与狙击手逐一点名，只要战术得当，就能无损过关。（当然高难度下近战士兵是否被反杀，我就不知道了哈哈哈。） [/list] 缺点： [list] [*]闪退——我的一周目通关期间大概闪退了20多次，每读档几次就会闪退一次。 [*]自由度——正如上方说到的，后期的Quad 9战士高攻高防，一个大面积开火就能毁灭你的阵容。无法远距离消除或是一击秒杀，你就完蛋了。因此总体而言，搭配自由度没有那么高。 [*]AI——主要是最后一战，[spoiler]也就是你唯一和盟友并肩作战的一战。你的盟友将会替你引怪，把怪拉到你身边，然后再后方来回踯躅，最后用狙击手一枪爆了你的狙击手的头。[/spoiler] [*]基地建设与相关数值——本作在BETA期间，我曾一度对本作的基地建设充满期待。正式版的基地建设只有功能解锁，且几乎所有物品都完全靠买。当然，对基地建设不感兴趣的玩家会喜欢这种设计，但于我而言，有些过于单调了。 [*]关卡设计——地图缺少各自明显的辩识性，因此也降低了潜在的策略性。我几乎用一套队员阵容从头打到尾，而这一点本来有可能有更多解。大规模杂兵？少数精英敌人？远程对狙？短兵相接？攻高？守低？或许本作有相关愿望，但最终成品没有体会出明显区别。 [*]角色自定义——好吧，我得说，我很难相信角色没有自定义转职和背景故事编辑。《XCOM2》的创意工坊已经告诉你这件事情的必要性了。 [*]支持语言——。 [/list] [hr][/hr] I truly cherish every new turn-based tactical game available on the market today, as this genre has nearly disappeared. This positive review is certainly intended to encourage developers to achieve greater sales, which in turn could help revive such games. Overall, however, [i]Warhounds[/i] is merely a solid [b]7 out of 10[/b] turn-based tactical experience. Is it an evolved version of [i]XCOM2[/i]? I can't say for sure. But given that [i]XCOM2[/i] has already been released over a decade ago, calling it an evolution might not be high praise. I would recommend it to players who deeply love tactical games, but if your interest in the genre isn't particularly strong, you might want to wait and see before deciding. Pros: [list] [*] The game features highly distinct classes for mercenaries, which is its standout characteristic. Melee soldiers' ultimate attacks, snipers' impact on overall strategy, support troops with seemingly endless healing and powerful utility skills, and explosive specialists who can detonate cars without mercy—there's definitely a class you'll love and want to develop, making this one of the best aspects of character customization in the game. [*] The overall difficulty is quite balanced, at least from my perspective as someone who enjoys standard mode. There are no so-called "nuisance monsters" here; even late-game Quad 9 warriors, despite their high attack and defense, can be taken down one by one by elite melee fighters and snipers if you play tactically—you can clear stages without taking damage. (Though I'm not sure what happens in hard mode when melee soldiers get counterattacked... haha.) [/list] Cons: [list] [*] Crashes — During my first playthrough, I experienced over ten crashes. Every time I loaded a save file, it would crash again. [*] Flexibility — As mentioned above, late-game Quad 9 warriors have extremely high attack and defense; a single large-scale attack can wipe out your entire team. Without long-range elimination or instant kill abilities, you're doomed. Therefore, overall, the build flexibility is relatively low. [*] AI — Mainly during the final battle, [spoiler]the only fight where you fight alongside your allies. Your ally will draw enemies toward you, then hesitate back and forth behind you before finally sniping your own sniper in the head with a single shot. [/spoiler] [*] Base Construction and Related Mechanics – During the beta phase, I was quite excited about the base-building system in this game. However, in the final version, base construction is limited to merely unlocking functions, with nearly all items requiring purchase. While players who aren't interested in base building might appreciate this design, for me it feels overly monotonous. [*] Level Design – The maps lack distinct identities, which diminishes their potential strategic depth. I essentially used the same team composition from start to finish, even though there could have been more variety. Massed grunts? A few elite enemies? Long-range sniping? Close combat? High offense? Low defense? Perhaps the developers had these ideas in mind, but the final product fails to deliver a clear sense of difference. [*] Character Customization – Well, I have to say, it's hard to believe that character customization doesn't include class progression or background story editing. The Workshop in [i]XCOM2[/i] already demonstrated how essential such features are. [*] Supported Languages – . [/list]

ya'll, it is xcom/ja3 in one. if you liked those games, you'll like this as well. i beat it in 62 hrs

X-com kedvelőinek alap!

Sehr kuul, macht spass :) leider hab ich momentan noch Abstürze in Missionen.. aber das fixen sie hoffentlich noch. Könnte der start einer kuulen neuen XCom like Reihe werden. Liebe geht raus.

ถ้าชอบเล่น xcom เกมนี้ถือว่าดีเลยแต่เอาจิงๆมันดูมีอะไรน้อยไปหน่อยอยากแบบให้มีพวกอาชีพมากขึ้นมีclass สูงขึ้น หรือด่านกว้างกว่านี้หรือแมฟมากกว่านี้ซักทางนึง