The Incident at Galley House

Fantastique jeu de déduction, dans la ligne d'Obra Dinn et de The Roottrees are dead ! Le mystère est fascinant à suivre, et la boucle de gameplay est satisfaisante et addictive. Je n'ai pas pu le lâcher, et l'ai terminé d'une traite. Il manquait peut-être une ou deux énigmes plus difficiles sur la fin. Une fois qu'on a compris le principe et mémorisé qui est qui, les déductions s'enchaînent très vite... Fortement recommandé !

found 'type help' in a reddit thread some weeks ago and lost my tab and with it my progress. this is when i learned this adaptation was only days away from release. just finished my playthrough and must say i really enjoyed it. i especially found the third act quite satisfying. 4.5 stars from me

神作毋庸置疑，笔记本功能有优化，剧情推动不再是去找线索整体玩下来很舒服，剧本质量也相当高，无敌了。 中期的难度曲线其实还是有问题的，在前期疯狂做笔记的绝大多数都是没用的，因为后面会反复提及，作为一个推理游戏，我有印象的误导信息可能只有关了2次门这一个，感觉上难度这一块还是偏低，在后期更是基本上靠剧情推动了都根本不需要去记什么东西，甚至这个最关键的诅咒核心的判断也没有什么意义，在后期跟着剧情走他会告诉你全部的，就让我想到的推理感觉有点无用... 但是，这个结局逻辑我想不明白啊 以下包含剧透没玩千万别看 31解锁的时候我懂他是想让玩家从现实角度带入这个忘掉事情的玩法，可以解释，但是那这样以来我去回想起67是谁的一瞬间我不就该死了吗？ 最后结局推理实在31 拿到id之后开始的 32的时候64去烧的教堂，在31拿到所有线索之后响的最后一声雷，也就是说无论哪个思路都不对啊，因为主角在31根本不知道这个人的，那解释不通为什么id表上没有，还有解释不通机器为什么能用。如果带入我还是被传染了这个逻辑，那这声雷也让逻辑不通啊，如果是这样，本尼线也有过纸条清除记忆不会清楚纸条上的字啊，所以也解释不了id表会消失的问题。 他这个最后的逻辑是 响雷之后64死亡（循环结束）主角想起了31自己推理时候有64的存在，如果说诅咒结束让主角回想，那是什么让主角在31推理的时候忘掉呢？前后矛盾啊，为什么会完全不知道这个人呢像是被屏蔽了一样，id表也没有，设备上也没有。 我能想到的结论是74在30戴的那个头盔发力了，逆转了诅咒效果，如果不是这样，大概率在31我会知道64并且延续诅咒。

Great whodunnit, even if a little bit too cryptic at times. I wish I had more tools to note certain informations on the timeline and use the portraits in it to cross out who isn't there anymore because the notepad is quite finnicky. I'd recommend it to all fans of golden idol and obra dinn.

总体还是推荐的，比《鲁特里一家死了》操作还顺畅点，游戏机制还一定程度上避免了穷举法硬解，好评。 不过大概玩到一半就能推理出核心设定，搞到最后其实没有那种恍然大悟的感觉，剧情稍微有点拉。 有点小贵，感觉7折以下比较合适。

I would absolutely reccomend this to those who seek a thrilling and layered mystery game! I went into this having already played "The Roottrees are Dead", but I knew virtually nothing about this one. That, I feel only elevated the experience, creating a similar exploratory effect as with "Outer Wilds". I ended up spending a lot of time thinking about the events of the game inbetween play-sessions, which is rare for me. Too often, I feel like games like these rely on massive leaps in logic for the story to make sense, or to solve the puzzles, but that rarely happened here. I only needed to make use of the hints a couple of times, nearly all of which resulted in a "duh", which really only means that it was my own impatience that was lacking, rather than the required puzzle pieces. In general the hints are very good because they are actual hints, and not just answers. The only exception to this was *potential spoiler alert* towards the end of the first segment of the game, where I had already collected all the necessary information, I just couldnt piece it all together, and I had to clock through nearly all of the hints, to get to one that didnt give me information I alrady knew. A little annoying, but really nothing but a minor detail. I kind of wish it was possible to turn the hints off, as it felt a little too tempting to press it whenever I got stuck, but I guess thats mainly a case of self control. The game is kind of short, but it also lasted longer than I had expected, which made the price so much more worth it. Thank you for making this amazing game! I will be looking forward to whatever this studio produces next!

Très cool jeu d'enquête et de déduction.