
Serious Sam: Shatterverse is a co-op roguelite FPS for 1 - 5 players. Blast through shifting universes, stack wild boons, bend the rules with run modifiers, and hunt Mental's deadliest forces. Fall fast. Come back louder.
Modeled estimate, not a reported figure. How we estimate →
Charts
Each storefront's own chart, in its own country — the closest public signal to sales where none is published. A country missing from a list is one we don't collect there, not one where the game doesn't chart.
No United States chart position — it charts only in the markets below.
Latest in each market: best PL #50, worst UA #92 · 9 markets collected
About
Engagement
Reviews
Themes across 422 recent reviews and how positive each mention is. A keyword signal, not full sentiment analysis.
Reviews
I really tried to like the game but..... The Gameplay is Incredible bad and boring. The Controls are sluggish and everything is just slow. Being a Roguelike game just made everything worse. A lot of the Maps are realy buggy, you just get stuck on everything. This game is a 2/10 Behaviour should have never touched Serious Sam... oh and it keeps crashing on max Quality
Средненькая игра, которая отчаянно нуждается в новом контенте из-за однообразного гринда.
Media

Related
Related
Price dynamics, follower growth, revenue and sales trajectories with interactive tooltips
This and every other Pro feature is free until October 20, 2026. A free account is all it takes.
Genres
Stats
All-time low is the lowest price we've recorded for this game since we started tracking it.
Languages: English, French, German, Spanish - Spain, Japanese, Korean, Polish, Portuguese - Brazil, Russian, Simplified Chinese, Traditional Chinese, Ukrainian
Hours played at review time, across 423 reviews with recorded playtime.
positive critical· bar length = how often the theme comes up
Overhated. It’s a simple multiplayer boomer shooter. Can anyone name another game that does something similar? For $17, it’s fun and mindless. Sometimes that’s all I want from a game.
It's a very nice Serious Sam spin-off, but it needs some playtime (4h+) to fully blossom with the last difficulty. The first difficulty is very mild, very easy. The second one is normal, with some more enemies but still — relatively easy once you unlock some new weapons. Now, the third one is pretty much HORDES of enemies swarming at you from everywhere, the legit Serious Sam experience, as much as a roguelite can offer. In small spaces it becomes cramped, but not too much, and in big spaces, there's no space to walk — it's all enemies of different kinds around you. Power-ups become INCREASINGLY more interesting too, with dual wielding, stacking ultimates, some other smaller stuff — it becomes a lot more fun! The highest difficulty positive experience is somewhat diluted by an obligatory choice of an anomaly bane — many of them can ruin the whole fun in an instance by making the game too hard to play. I think it should be optional, there are enough enemies to make the life hard without this bs. There are definitely balance issues here and there, with some weapons and ultimates clearly being better than others. For example, a magic book requires a lot of catalysts spent to get it, yet its performance is abysmal, it's easily the worst weapon in the whole game — its magic doesn't even track enemies, it just fires straight with awful speed, awful damage! It felt... VERY dissapointing. The cannon also feels like it's not worth it, it's too slow and the damage doesn't feel high enough for that rate of fire — overheating for a very long time in just 3 shots, each lands around 500 dmg. A sniper rifle, at the same time, is easily one of the best investments — you can shoot through multiple enemies right away, with a good DPS too! And then, Alien Sam can dismantle a boss in 2-3 seconds from 100% to 0% HP with his upgraded quad wielding. Some power-ups are... underwhelming in comparison to others. But at least with them it's part of the "random" nature of the game, whilst the guns? The ultimates? Could have been balanced better than that, but still, it's not like it's too bad. Just "normal", I guess. It's not good, but not bad. Bugs exist, but they were pretty rare. One or two enemies can get stuck, but also rarely. The annoying obligatory bane anomaly on the highest difficulty should have been optional — and the game would have been very good, despite its cons. Still, it IS good even now, in its current state. And they DID improve the game since the beta: for example, now a golem boss can spawn smaller golems (yet for some reason, it doesn't always spawn them), also you can pretty often find weapons you haven't bought yet, in the wooden chests. I had reasonable hopes for this game, and they were pretty much fulfilled. I find it idiotic that many players expected an original Serious Sam experience from a spin-off — spin-offs that were historically different from the main games. These guys infested the reviews, and it's a pity that a good game got bombed just like that, out of unrequited "nostalgia" — a nostalgia that was never promised to them. For now, I hope the game won't become abandoned because of this mass hysteria.
ive played for 7 minutes, this feels more like a early beta test than a game that would be worth 17.99€
A game with a great concept but poor execution. Unfortunately, it still hasn't lived up to its potential since the closed beta. It's a 4-6 hour game, and after that, you just don't feel like playing it anymore. UPDATE: I'm not one of those people who think it was better in the beta, but I want to point out that the developers haven't changed their ways since then. The game lacks proper progression. For release, they limited the player's weapon choices. Now you have to gradually grind your way to your desired weapon, even if you absolutely DON'T LIKE some weapons. The characters' abilities don't really fit their look, and overall, not every ability for each character actually makes sense. The inventory is still way too bloated. You won't use all your weapons in combat, yet switching between them is clunky. The game still suffers from network and performance issues (this is especially noticeable in multiplayer). The music is decent but completely forgettable, and in some parts, it genuinely feels like a small portion of the soundtrack was just run through an AI for making a cover. For some reason, the game still uses CGI cutscenes, even though it's 2026, guys. It doesn't feel challenging at all. You can easily finish a run with just three weapons (unless you happen to run into the Lava Golem). The game definitely has great potential, but the developers didn't listen to the players, ignoring the feedback from the closed beta. It feels like the game was forced by upper management, and the release date was dictated by the investors. The developers themselves ended up as hostages to their own creation. Once they saw the player reviews, they must have realized the game was doomed to fail, but there's no turning back now. I don't know what will happen to the game next. It all depends on how satisfied the investors and management are with the metrics. The game will likely die off quickly given the current state of affairs, or maybe get some sort of rework (though I highly doubt that'll happen).
a joke of a game, not fun or interesting not even got the feel of a serious sam game
All those negative reviews? Mental propaganda. Don't fall for the lies and help save the Shatterverse by joining the Serious Program!
Возвращение Крутого Сэма! Не такое, какое ждали почитатели этой невероятной серии шутеров, но всё равно крутое и самобытное - интересный эксперимент!
Maybe I'm just biased as I love Serious Sam but I genuinely don't understand the hate here. Serious Sam Shatterverse is in no way meant to be a mainline title or a replacement of Croteam's classic formula of Serious Sam. Has anyone ever played the spinoffs before? Let's all take a step back here and set our expectations correctly. This is a rogue-like game. You are going to die. Probably a lot. That is what rogue-likes are. You die, learn from your mistakes and collect trinkets through every playthrough so that you slowly build more strength despite the trials and errors. Again, this is a rogue-like. If you're a serious sam fan and you're jumping in expecting it to be like the mainline games, you're going to be disappointed. I could scroll through these reviews and talk about the absurd complaints people are having, but in this case it's really just a matter of playing the game yourself and coming up with your own opinion. [h2]Here's what I think:[/h2] I haven't played too much of it but I absolutely love it. It's a blend of familiarity yet still new enough to feel refreshing. Compared to the playtest, it feels as though each mission has a random set of rooms each playthrough and I'm all for it. There's a lot of throwbacks too. Most of the original enemies and weapons make a comeback and there's a few areas referenced from the older games as well. I also enjoy the aspect of enemies having stronger variations popping in the further you progress. Reminds me of Destiny in some aspects which I also quite enjoy. I'm not sure what the replayability will be like once you complete all the difficulties, but given each playthrough feels different from the next, I imagine there will be quite some time spent here. Hopefully more future updates to come. The silly tone and visuals don't particularly bother me either. Serious Sam Double D XXL was easily one of the most bizarre spinoffs out there yet it was received quite well. I think the community wanted a new mainline Serious Sam and despite the many indications of it NOT being that, they were let down and disappointed. Either way, as long as I live I'll always enjoy Serious Sam whether it's a spinoff or a mainline game. Keep em' coming.
Selling now
See how fast this game is selling right now — estimated copies and revenue per day from recent review growth.
Active players
Estimated daily and monthly active players (DAU/MAU) modeled from peak concurrency.
Players by region
Where this game's players are, estimated from review languages.
Players also reviewed
The games this title's players most often review too — audience affinity.
Related
| Game | Estimated lifetime revenue | Reviews | Review score | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $992 | 8 | 50% | $5.99 | |
| $730.3K | 1.5K | 90% | $19.99 | |
| $208.2K | 692 | 63% | $19.99 | |
| $1.5K | 4 | 75% | $14.99 | |
| $529 | 3 | 100% | $6.99 | |
| $280 | 3 | 33% | $4.99 |
Related
| Game | Estimated lifetime revenue | Reviews | Review score | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $370.5K | 1.7K | 93% | $4.99 | |
| $370.6K | 605 | 89% | $17.99 | |
| $370.7K | 1.6K | 59% | $9.99 | |
| $370.8K | 782 | 92% | $19.99 | |
| $370K | 1.3K | 91% | $10.39 | |
| $371K | 881 | 85% | $16.79 |