Rotwood

手感扎实动画流畅角色可爱，远程武器有特色，动作部分无可挑剔。肉鸽方面最增加爽感的动作模组一局只能吃一个，还不一定每局都有，只能算个添头。 主观评分 7 不错 https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3750212034

好玩是好玩的 通关是简单的 更新是困难的 内容是一点不缺的 武器是单调的 装备是固定的 物品是溢出的 神力是用来装饰的 头目是精致的 怪物是多样的 人物是数值的 战斗是AWSD的 蒜头是弱势的 芋姆是操作的 牛蓝是脆皮的 蚁头是没有伤害的

第一次科雷让我失望的作品，首发尝试了一段时间，觉得游戏不是很完善，以为随着游戏更新科雷会让人满意，奈何到现在几乎摆烂不更新了，内容也依然不甚充足。看来设计底层还是有问题。

Rotwood suffers from limited content, shallow combat, poor balance between weapons and bosses, permanent multiplayer progression bugs and is simply overpriced. I cannot imagine further patches altering the game sufficiently for me to ever suggest a purchase.

任务就紧盯着你那弱智连击数不放呢，怪有多多动症你们自己心里没有点b数吗，毕业玩家更新后被迫回头打老关打人几刀就秒了拿你的老冯刷连击数吗？还强迫玩家体验其他垃圾武器，在通关任务里面限制武器类型，游戏是半成品的，任务要求是自己没试过的，进攻骰子是刷不出来的，挤牙膏的更新是少量的，恶心谁呢

谁能想到科雷的抢鲜体验也能烂尾啊

一坨大便，别看我只有11小时，我是从24年测试版玩起的，直到现在新内容几乎没有，所以极其不推荐，不好玩的烂游戏褒姒的

TLDR; Rotwood has a charming aesthetic and competent combat fundamentals, but shallow progression, repetitive content, and conflicting design goals keep it from becoming a lasting roguelike experience. Functionality: --- - Runs well on Steam Deck (~60 FPS) - However, the Deck tends to heat up despite relatively low system utilization - No crashes or major technical issues encountered Coherence --- - Strong visual identity: characters, enemies, and environments fit together well - Story is forgettable; NPC dialogue is overly long yet largely empty - Long meta-progression with little meaningful variation in playstyle - Many weapons and armor pieces offer mostly gimmicky or negligible abilities - Very few impactful abilities early or late in the game - Challenges initially reward meta-currency but quickly devolve into cosmetic rewards - Levels become repetitive (same enemies, similar rooms, limited ability and weapon variety) - Only five weapon classes — interesting designs, but far too few overall - Boss design suffers from constant add-spam that artificially prolongs fights - Weapon combo systems (focus attacks) provide some mechanical skill depth Expression --- - The game struggles with fundamental design conflicts - It attempts to be both a single-player and multiplayer experience simultaneously - Too little gameplay variety for solo play, hidden behind heavy meta-progression for multiplayer - As a result, the game becomes quickly forgettable: - playing only occasionally feels unrewarding - long play sessions reveal the same shallow loop - Ultimately too superficial for both playstyles - A solid but shallow game whose price is difficult to justify - The shadow-drop release suggests internal closure rather than long-term expansion - After two years in Early Access, development appears to have plateaued: -- limited gameplay variety -- heavy reliance on cosmetics -- meta-grind extending playtime artificially - Future patches or DLC are unlikely to address the fragile core design