Outbreak: Epidemic

NIE MA MOWY miałło byc z zapowiedzi coś ale left for dead ale matko jedyna formułą jest tak drewniana ze ładnie można było by dac to do kominika i pieknie by trzeszczął w sumie kominiek nie jets juz potrzebny by ta gra trzeczłą ci pomeidyzzembami ;/ ✂---✂---✂---✂---✂---✂---✂---✂---✂---✂---✂---✂--- FOR DEV - READ THIS ! if you want know somethnig about you game more/ some specific just write us on commect ok ? i will rewrite in commect Piszemy rónież normlane pełno prawne recnezje więc jeśli Szukasz więcej recnezji/naszej twórczosci zapraszam na mój profil steam w sekcji recnezji lub zastnawiesz się czemu tyle błedów ? Zapraszam do obserowania i przecyztania opisu na mojej grupie kuratora Aga i my steam curator w internetach

For anyone that played Outbreak: Lost Hope this feels like a natural sequel but with co-op added in. Now I've only played it solo so far but I enjoyed my time with it. Differences from the previous game other than the multiplayer aspect are amongst other things the fact that it is now split into levels rather than being a smooth single world. It also has no save system so you gotta beat levels in one go and if you die it's back to the beginning. Another change is that enemies no longer stumble to let you more easily run past like they did before, which makes sense since this isn't as focused on conserving ammunition. They do however now take increased damage from headshots instead which is a welcome addition. One thing that didn't bother me playing solo but I could imagine might annoy some people when playing multiplayer is that there are quite a few puzzles that require you to stop and read documents for hints. Anyways, not the best in the series but it's pretty fun and does bring some new things to the table.

[i] My Experience [/i] My co-op partner and I picked up Outbreak: Epidemic after playing (and mostly enjoying) Outbreak: The New Nightmare, which was a fun return to old-school Resident Evil-style gameplay. We liked fixed camera angles and inventory management. Epidemic attempts to modernize the formula by switching to a third-person view and making shot placement more important, but it sort of flubs the execution. Aiming does not feel good or precise, and the new camera angle accentuates some already-present jankiness that wasn't as obvious in The New Nightmare. The first three levels were OK. We played them on normal difficulty, slowly and methodically eradicating the infestation. However, the fourth campaign level represented a huge roadblock. Although we'd had no issues with the previous levels, we suddenly found ourselves missing the ammo and firepower we needed. After losing again, we tried it on the easy difficulty. Actually getting the weapons and ammo needed to deal with this scenario on normal requires diving in and out of danger, grabbing specific items while dodging and weaving away from the enemies. You'd have to have pre-existing knowledge about the map layout, which wasn't necessary to be successful in previous maps. Since there are no checkpoints and some of the maps can take almost an hour, losing due to information you couldn't have known feels bad. We finished the fifth and final campaign level on easy as well. Although we only tried it on normal once (whereas we tried the fourth level twice), we again (like in the fourth level) became outmatched due to a lack of ammo and firepower. Epidemic just lacked the charm of The New Nightmare, for us. Players looking for a co-op third-person shooting horror experience should just go snag Resident Evil 5.

this game is so ♥♥♥♥ please kill me

Sorry, i can't recommend it.

VERY GOOD [ ] GOOD [ ] OK [ ] BAD [X] VERY BAD [ ]