Millennia

美术ui过于粗糙，整体设计有精彩的部分，但是平衡性不足，作为一个这样定价的制作来说总体表现欠佳。

不知道这款游戏还会不会更新下去呀，框架很棒内容丰富游戏性很强，就是ui和引导做得起步门槛稍微高了一些。 如果还出季票我还买，新出的几个dlc都是直接加时代加玩法的超值dlc。能看出来这款游戏的制作组是个比起美术音乐等等更在乎玩法并且创意无限的工作室。

Ich finde es ist das beste 4K Spiel auf dem Markt. Durch die verschiedenen Epochen und Warenketten spielt es sich jedesmal anders. Natürlich ist die Grafik ein paar Jahre hinterher aber als alter Gamer stört mich das nicht allzu sehr. Viele Funktionen des Spieles scheinen mir nicht fertig programmiert zu sein. Schätzte das hätte noch durch DLCs kommen können wenn es kommerziell erfolgreicher gewesen wäre. Ich würde mich über einen zweiten Teil freuen.

Abandoned

不说别的，能不能继续更新，明明感觉想法都不错，但是不继续优化更新

[h1] The UI and graphics are not great. They are readable, but the game doesn't make things easy for you. And another thing: The only thing this game has in common with Civ is that it is a historical 4X! [/h1] So I really enjoy this one. This is why: 1) It is a much more historic-minded take on a the historical 4X game. Unlike say Civilization which assumes your civilization has immutable characteristics from the dawn of time, Millennia takes the idea that environment, neighbors, resources, etc. are what shaped a civilization into what it is. You are building your civilization as you play, and by the end of the game will end up with a civilization that differs from others to a depth you are not going to see in classic historic 4Xes, and feels organic based on both your choices and how history evolves. 2)The alternate history ages are really cool and generally feel very distinct. Each one has its own improvements, buildings, and special mechanics, and can have a big impact on how the game plays out. I haven't seen all of them yet, but almost all the ones I have seen are very cool and I look forward to see the ones I am not aware of and what modders and DLC will do with them over time. 3)As you get the hang of it, you'll probably start to appreciate the systems, and how the game progressively introduces them. Early on in the Age of Stone and even Age of Bronze you won't have much to manage. By the late game, you're spinning dozens of plates, but assuming you know the basics of how to spin a plate in this game, the number added doesn't really matter all that much because they're added gradually. 4)No, the biggest issue with Millennia is the AI. Your half-witted rivals, possessed of the viciousness of a school of piranha and the memories of goldfish, are adequate enemies but extremely poor diplomatic partners – a fact a bit too reminiscent of my old favorite. Sure, they play the technical game well enough: against Adept AIs (the default) it's hard to be the tech leader and control what age the world goes into, at least unless and until you do something to really establish your heft (like using the Age of Blood to render yourself alone on a continent, say). But your options for talking to other nations are bare bones without sending an envoy on a frustrating mission of getting roadblocked by “friendly” units, and still anemic if you do manage to get there. I understand some things, like repeatedly begging for open borders when denied, but even among themselves the AIs will make and cancel agreements with startling rapidity, allowing the player to watch a procession of one-turn wars and peaces if they're fortunate enough to have met everybody. 5)Other than that, while the overall art quality doesn't precisely bother me, there are a few nagging UX sorts of complaints. For instance, winning doesn't necessarily feel good or momentous: you get a honking fanfare and a popup that features, at least in the case of the wins I've yet done, the age art. Come on, even Civ 2 gave a very rudimentary animated cutscene with its own few seconds of musical score for victory! There's no “one more turn” option either; objectively minor and probably unnecessary, but who hasn't at least once won a relatively peaceful game and then in the postscript gone psycho and burned down all those infuriating AIs? 6)Complaints about RNG do seem valid to me; some games seem much easier to me than others. But I'm approaching that as a puzzle--a sign that there are aspects of the game I don't fully understand. And I'm seeing some evidence that's right, because I've been finding some ways to adapt to various starting conditions to get to a solid mid-game state. Frankly, the biggest issue I've found is that, when you play on the "continents" map, you have no way to interact with what's going on on in the other hemisphere, and sometimes one of the AIs will blob up before you get to a tech level where you can do anything about them. Perhaps that can be improved with fine tuning, but, for me at least, it doesn't ruin my enjoyment that I can't win every game. Likewise, more options for setting up the game--especially map types--would be welcome. And I expect they're coming--in fact, looking at the roadmap, I know at least one is soon to be delivered. [b]Millennia attempts to revitalize the 4X formula established by Civ games, and does a good job of doing just that.[/b]

Better than Civ7