
Zooicide is a casual team-based multiplayer game featuring animals fighting against humans within a playfully dangerous environment, the zoo.
Modeled estimate, not a reported figure. How we estimate →
About
Genres
Stats
All-time low is the lowest price we've recorded for this game since we started tracking it.
Languages: English
Engagement
Reviews
Themes across 41 recent reviews and how positive each mention is. A keyword signal, not full sentiment analysis.
Reviews
[quote][b]Warning: Dead PVP Game[/b] This game has no meaningful single player content, and no playable PvP servers. There is no functioning PvP population, it's a dead game, and cannot be played as intended.[/quote]I'm not really sure if Zooicide is an asset flip. Some elements of this game certainly make it seem like the developer put some effort into assembling some kind of original here. On the other hand, a lot of the game assets don't seem like they were created by the developer, but they haven't credited any asset creators for supplying assets, which might be a case of plagiarism. There's no evidence, so we need to give the benefit of the doubt... regardless, asset flip or not, the quality here is indistinguishable from many asset flip/cash grab scams, and that's a problem in itself. Zooicide is an older game from 2017. It's a venerable 8 years old at the time of this review. It's a completely dead PvP arena combat game with no players. The idea (which I am sure nobody is surprised didn't catch on) is that a variety of zoo animals are pitted against each other or humans in a zoo themed arena. Yeah... nobody asked for this. The game was abandoned roughly 7 months after launch and hasn't been updated in 7 and a half years. It blew past the developers commitment to complete the game without any notification or admission of failure from the developer. The game will never be completed. On the upside, the game does feature customisable controls and resolution, so at least some of the basic, minimum requirements have been met. Unfortunately there's a number of other technical defects and shortcomings which contribute to the game being difficult to recommend to gamers. The game features lazy low-polygon "retro" assets, making this look like a barely functional 3D game from the 1990s. It's unclear why the developers weren't able to arrange high quality, high polygon count contemporary assets for the game, and also irrelevant... what matters is that this looks bad as a result of their decisions, a compromise PC gamers shouldn't have to put up with. The developers made the fatal, lazy mistake of believing that PvP, other players, would be an acceptable substitute for doing the difficult job of adding single player level design, storytelling, NPCs and other rich aspects of designed game content to the game. As a result of this choice by the developers, the game has little to no actual interactive game content. It's a little considered fact that the vast majority of PvP only, multiplayer only games [b]fail[/b]. Developers must learn that other players are not an acceptable substitute for doing the job of game developers and building a game filled with content. PvP only games must have a [b]huge[/b] player base for them to "go viral" and succeed. But with no single player experience to add lasting value to a game, the developers instead chose to bet against all odds that their game would "go viral" without any actual reason for players to want to play the game. Predictably, they lost this bet. Compounding this problem, the developers made the terrible mistake of launching a multiplayer only game in Early Access. This is almost certain to kill the game. Most gamers will evaluate a game only once. If they do so when the game is incomplete, they will check it out, then abandon it (just like the developers did). When (IF) the game eventually does get around to release, there will be no players, because the developers burned the first impressions through their faulty Early Access experience. Players who saw the game and didn't like it because it was incomplete [i]do not come back[/i]. Multiplayer games must have a large population if they are to go "viral" and succeed, especially without single player content to fall back on. Releasing a multiplayer only game into early access kills the game population, and thus the game, before the game even launches. These technical defects push this game below acceptable standards for any modern PC game. Unethically, the developers have left this on the Steam store in a dead, abandoned and unplayable state (because there's no players and no meaningful single player content). It's the responsibility of the developer to maintain their product, ensure it runs on all modern PCs, or if they determine there's defects and the game doesn't work, or the population dies, they should remove it from sale instead of misleadingly trying to scam gamers into buying knowingly dead/unplayable products. This is harmful to Steam and to gamers, not just because it's a direct and intentional attempt to scam people, but because it takes a share of the marketing space and visibility away from other games. It's polluting Steam and making it harder for gamers to find genuine games and for genuine indie developers who put months or years into making proper games find an audience. Another unethical act of this developer, knowing full well that this game is abandoned and they will never complete it, they are deliberately trying to scam gamers into buying it by offering it on discount and selling keys to the game from third party key resellers. It's impossible to "accidentally" discount a game. The developer looked at their abandoned game, and instead of doing the right thing and removing it from Steam, they instead doubled-down and tried to scam even more people into paying for it. Greedy, and completely unethical. Doing the wrong thing, on purpose, for money. This is not okay. Furthering the unethical nature of this developer, while they are selling this incomplete game under Valve's failed Early Access program, they're abusing that program, and not working on this game full time, as they have other projects in the works. That means there's ZERO confidence anyone who buys this in Early Access will receive a complete game, and it's possible that they're being scammed. So, should you buy this game? Is this one of the best of the 110,000+ games on Steam? The developer is deliberately and unethically trying to scam gamers into paying them the farcical price of $5 USD for a game they know is abandoned, dead and unplayable. Don't give it to them. For comparison, the $5 asking price for this game could get you games like "Rainbow 6 Siege", "Middle Earth - Shadow of Mordor" or "Company of Heroes". Quality, professionally made games like those are frequently on sale cheaper than this.
Media

Related
Related
Price dynamics, follower growth, revenue and sales trajectories with interactive tooltips
This and every other Pro feature is free until October 20, 2026. A free account is all it takes.
Hours played at review time, across 41 reviews with recorded playtime.
positive critical· bar length = how often the theme comes up
smash
Zooicide is a really bad game. Do not buy this. It should not be allowed to be sold on steam for $5. I played this on release several years ago from a free key that I got in a mass giveaway. There were a few players around release but I imagine shortly after everyone vanished and rightfully so. It is extremely clunky, not fun and buggy. You will not find others to play with and the bots that you can add in custom games leave quite a lot to be desired. What is unfortunate is that the developers only previous game was "Who's Your Daddy?!" which has very positive reviews. With Zooicide they released it in Early Access in a horrible state and then completely abandoned it. TLDR......... DO NOT BUY THIS.
BEST GAME EVER
i like game
I represent PETA
SB游戏 鬼服了 整个游戏就我一个人
Suicget it
Wszystko jest zjebane ogólnie
i played this game once in 2018 or something and there were no players in any lobbies
Selling now
See how fast this game is selling right now — estimated copies and revenue per day from recent review growth.
Players by region
Where this game's players are, estimated from review languages.
Related
| Game | Estimated lifetime revenue | Reviews | Review score | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $408.5K | 1.3K | 88% | $9.99 | |
| $36K | 285 | 74% | $5.99 | |
| — | 0 | — | — | |
| $62.8M | 318K | 98% | $9.99 | |
| $2M | 18.8K | 87% | $3.99 | |
| $613.1K | 6.5K | 87% | $4.99 |
Related
| Game | Estimated lifetime revenue | Reviews | Review score | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $61.7K | 195 | 36% | $14.99 | |
| $61.7K | 130 | 79% | $14.99 | |
| $61.7K | 260 | 90% | $14.99 | |
| $61.7K | 119 | 84% | $19.99 | |
| $61.8K | 347 | 83% | $9.99 | |
| $61.7K | 267 | 72% | $9.99 |