
Debate for your life against brilliant thinkers, poke holes in their arguments and cause them to freak out— or just tell them their faces are ugly. NONSENSE!
Revenue comes from in-game items and microtransactions, which our price-based model doesn't estimate. The player count below is how many people own it, not what they spent.
About
Genres
Stats
Languages: English
Engagement
Reviews
Themes across 63 recent reviews and how positive each mention is. A keyword signal, not full sentiment analysis.
Reviews
A unique and fun debate visual novel based on the work of specific philosophers, would recommend!
Gerçekten çok işlevsel bir felsefe simülasyonu. Sokrates'in kendisi ile yarışmak ayrı biz eğlence oldu. Ancak Pro Philospher 2 ile daha çok filozof görmek iyi olabilir. Descartes ile tartışmak isterim.
Amazing game. Needs more accountant hate and grandstanding
Media

Related
Related
Price dynamics, follower growth, revenue and sales trajectories with interactive tooltips
This and every other Pro feature is free until October 20, 2026. A free account is all it takes.
Hours played at review time, across 63 reviews with recorded playtime.
positive critical· bar length = how often the theme comes up
苏格拉底·成步堂和阿里阿德涅·迷宫小助手的逆转裁判(arbiter)! 以道德问题为核心,分别对[spoiler]欧绪弗洛、普罗泰戈拉、霍布斯、米勒、康德和“观念裁判” [/spoiler]異議あり,对他们的主要学说进行了游戏式简化、甚至可以说极简化的设计[spoiler](诚然越概括误导越多,但考虑到毕竟是游戏,去细化思想未免缘木求鱼,关于“完美解”这一点游戏结尾也做出了非常漂亮的总结)[/spoiler],里面的对话表现太有趣了,还融入了每个哲学家的性格(散步虽迟但到),大笑。立绘和配乐也贴切。 完美解决了推理游戏(这回是真·推理了)普遍缺乏深度和文笔的问题,毕竟重要的不止思想本身,还有表述的方式——这应该是玩过的逆转like里写作手法上最逆转的一个了,虽然篇幅短没展开(避免了琐碎无聊),但能以接地气说人话的方式概括呈现复杂概念、贴切描绘小人物、对话生动戏剧化、幽默而不油滑,结尾还能将所有case再编织收束升华到一个关怀里去,甚至还有(丑徽章)和最终逆转……论辩的意义不在于唯一绝对解、不在于结果谁对谁错,而是在辩论的过程中无论胜负,真理都得到了澄清发展与进步(伽利略大意)。每个思考者都走在同一条不断开拓与延伸的道路上……论辩永远有价值。 对话、追问、提出矛盾、承认无知,而求知即美德,这就是主角叫做Socrate的原因。每个人都可以是the great thinker。 这竟然是个免费游戏。思考与盈利,两个价值体系。
The Pro Philosopher series is an edutainment game series where you debate dead philosophers. While it tackles political topics, it is less interested in providing answers and is more interested in giving the tools that are necessary in critical thought. For every philosopher that you debate, you are put in the reactive role of examining arguments and using their own logic against them by pointing out internal consistencies. This is done repeatedly through 1) asking for clarification, 2) asking the philosophers to back up their claim, 3) asking the relevance (or pointing out irrelevance) of their statement, and lastly, 4) by challenging their statements by pointing out inconsistencies and gaps in their claims. The game is Socratic at its core. It is an approachable and entertaining introduction to philosophy. And is great for encouraging young teens, students, or anyone unfamiliar with philosophy to engage in critical thinking. Those who already know philosophy may still find it a charming, humorous, and refreshing exercise. There may be nitpicks to make, bit it's exploration of the philosopher's thoughts are adequate even if it's not that deep.
Образовательная визуальная новелла с элементами головоломки, где игрок выступает в роли философа Сократа Джонса. Задача — вести диалоги‑дебаты, анализировать аргументы, выявлять логические ошибки и защищать свою позицию. Игра знакомит с основами логики и философскими концепциями в игровой форме. Плюсы: Обучающий потенциал — наглядно объясняет базовые принципы логики, типы аргументов и распространённые ошибки мышления через геймплей. Интерактивные дебаты — диалоги построены как головоломки: нужно выбирать правильные контраргументы и выстраивать цепочки рассуждений, что делает обучение активным. Юмористический стиль — лёгкая подача и ироничные ситуации смягчают сложность философских тем, делая их доступнее для широкой аудитории. Минусы: Ограниченная глубина философии — игра фокусируется на логике и базовых концепциях, оставляя в стороне более сложные философские теории и дискуссии. Линейность диалогов — несмотря на видимость выбора, варианты ответов строго ограничены, а альтернативные пути рассуждений не поддерживаются. Монотонность механики — повторяющиеся схемы выявления ошибок (например, «ложная дилемма» или «апелляция к эмоциям») со временем могут наскучить. Итог: подойдёт любителям интеллектуальных игр, студентам и всем, кто хочет в лёгкой форме познакомиться с логикой и философией. Socrates Jones: Pro Philosopher увлечёт юмористическим подходом и интерактивными дебатами, но может разочаровать тех, кто ищет глубокие философские дискуссии или нелинейные дискуссии с множеством вариантов развития.
Charming, witty, and a solid intro to critical thinking. Plus, it's completely free.
I liked the game, it has problems but I feel those are mainly due to the limitations of adapting a debate into a videogame.
I beat the game
Wow, that was a sharp one! Interesting, insightful approach to moral philosophy and debating, with more narrative turns than I expected. I was also suprised how challenging it was - I did the mistake of giving it a shot after a long working day, and that definitely wasn't the best of ideas. Nothing to hold against the game, though! There where situations where I found it a bit straining to uncover the dialog path to an objection I already had in my mind, and I'm still not convinced that I really proved [spoiler]Mills[/spoiler] wrong with my objection ([spoiler]I mean, his point basically served as final argument in game: We need to accept a procedural approach and we have to continue to strive[/spoiler]), but most situations were handled convincing/natural enough. I wished the protagonist wouldn't be such a jerk, though. Recommend if you're willing to read and think, and if you are interested in moral philosophy!
Players by region
Where this game's players are, estimated from review languages.
Players also reviewed
The games this title's players most often review too — audience affinity.
Related
| Game | Estimated lifetime revenue | Reviews | Review score | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $49.7K | 212 | 98% | $11.99 | |
| $0 | 0 | — | $4.99 | |
| $5.5K | 60 | 95% | $7.99 | |
| $5.4K | 51 | 76% | $6.99 | |
| $0 | 20 | 90% | Free | |
| — | 0 | — | — |