Recesses

The 'g' key was the best unlockable in the game! Some Handy Game Facts Main Character: 11 hair tips Clair: 12 freckles Eugene: 6 stinky fingers Tatiana: 26 G's Joey: 6 stripes Emily: 33 tiny polka dots Dong: 1 mole Ms. Raven: 6 punctuations Mr. Whittier: 7 stains Big Dog: 6 stitches Mika: 2 band aids Wires: 14 creases Syryna: 6 jewelry pieces Principle Keener: 17 winkles Goat: 3 udders

You need to play this game. That's all.

This game is punching way above it's weight! It's a great deck builder, with a lot a varied strategy available and some very interesting mechanics. On top of that, the writing genuinely interesting. 10 hours in, I still have plenty of fun playing it. + A trove of bird based puns

Fun card game with a interesting story. Definitely recommend the game, Especially for the price

Good game, fun gameplay, interesting story. I am writing this as I'm just about to meet Claire, and rest of this review will be a spoiler-heavy rant. The third Unbearable Truth is bad. I know the game would say that "I just am not ready to accept it, that's why it's called Unbearable" or something on that level, but it's just plain stupid. First of all why would life have a purpose? There is no mind behind the universe, that much has been established already. What is the meaning of the word "purpose" if there's nobody who would hold that purpose, nobody who created life to impart that purpose on it? It's a meaningless concept. Just because the past exhibited a certain development pattern doesn't mean that this particular extrapolation of that pattern is somehow more likely or correct or desirable. Second: why would a technological consciousness be able to surpass the limits of the Second Unbearable Truth? It would still be created within the confines of our universe, and need to abide by its laws. Why is the analogy to an ant used first to show how simialr humans are to ants and how powerless we are to go against the rules of the universe, and then used to say that we are superior and intrinsically capable of more? Just because a technological consciousness would be developed by conscious effort of sentient beings instead of natural evolution doesn't mean it will be capable of more quality-wise. (Undeniably it would be capable of doing what we can do faster and more efficiently) Just like having consciousness doesn't give us more free will than ants, a technological consciousness wouldn't be more free just because it was *designed*. This is a very disappoinitng conclusion to an excellent line of philosophy, and I'm sad that the author invented their own god in the end. I hope experiencing the game's finale will change something.

if i had the time I'd print the cards out and play this kitchen table style. I'm having a blast

Don't mind my hours, as I left game on while AFK. Mild recommend. Game has charm, topics are kind of interesting and the card game itself is satisfying enough, but the further in the game you get, the more RNG elements are introduced. I've tried whittling against the final boss for about 2-3h and it's gone downhill every time. Game also doesn't let you try immediately again, as you lose progress, each time you lose there. For the price of the game, there's actually a lot of content, but I feel that the experience becomes worse, the further you get. I'm stopping here so that I don't sour my memory of the game completely. I recommend trying the demo, for the undecided.

About halfway through I assume, but for the philosophically waxing elementary school students and surprisingly engaging card game mechanics it gets my recommendation