John Carpenter's Toxic Commando

Vous pouvez vous faire exclure d'une partie sans raison par un système de vote inadapté. Le jeu est intéressant mais premier arrivé premier servit sur les loots et ressources. Personne ne jouera la classe medic mais par contre si vous avez le malheur de ne pas heal les enfants capricieux de votre TEAM qui ne vous aides pas ou ne vous revive jamais et ben vous prenez une exclusion. Penser pour jouer à 4 mais certainement pas pour du solo ou de la duo

Its so boring after you play it 4 or 5 times... every level feels the same, there's absolutly nothing special about this game. It just copies games people have been playing for 20+ years.

maybe at this rate there will be a actual game in like 4 years, right now you just have a demo to a idea and does not seem like they even know what that idea is, game feels like a bucket list of check boxes in every bad way, love how this genre just progressively goes backwards just ignore this game and check back in many years if the servers are still up for reference a game in a smaller genre like Marathon avrg 6k players right now and is called a total flop.. toxic commando right now and over last couple months has a avg of 100 players... yeah

This game is action packed and plenty of Zombies, World War Z players will recognize the weapons. This game is like if World War Z had a face lift and chest augmentations.

"At first, the game was actually pretty fun. The mini-games felt fresh and were totally doable. But as I got into the higher difficulties—from Very Hard up to the final level—I got completely stuck on those same mini-games. I just couldn't pass them, which meant I couldn't finish the levels. Honestly, this design choice feels really stupid. It adds unnecessary artificial difficulty that comes down to dumb button-mashing mechanics rather than actual skill. Compared to World War Z, that game is way more fun. It might be older, but it's just a far superior experience. I’ve put in over 60 hours here and I still haven't figured out how to switch to a 3rd-person perspective."

I cannot recommend this game in good faith. In short, it's a Left 4 Dead clone with some new mechanics, but without actually fleshing them out before release. Another giant negative is that it's yet another one of these online-only games, meaning that even if you did like this game, they can effectively revoke your access to the game YOU bought when they shut down the servers because it's no longer profitable for them. There's a serious disconnect between the advertised vibe they're going for and what you actually get. The music is about the only thing that's 80's inspired, and it is pretty good, however there are plenty of bad games with great soundtracks. The writing also reeks of everyone's [i]favorite[/i] canadian narrative consultation group, and it's something that cannot be ignored for the sake of the gameplay, which is at best ok and at worst a slog to get through. 3/10. Not as bad as Fallout 76 was, but if I was John Carpenter I'd be embarrassed my name was associated with this mess.

I cannot, in good faith, recommend this game. I want to like it, it has good aspects, but it is ruined by a single style that drives(ha) the whole game. It is nothing, but driving. Fire who thought that ever map should be a driving map with all the swamp water. Every map looks the exact same. They all play out the exact same way. All to suit this dumb vehicle gameplay. Unless a lot of it is changed, save your money and go play L4D or B4B. Both games are just better if you are looking for a hoard shooter.