Tactics Ogre, crown jewel of the tactical role-playing genre, is reborn! Based on the 2010 release, the game features improved graphics and sound, as well as updated game design, bringing to life a new Tactics Ogre that remains true to its roots.
Modeled estimate, not a reported figure. How we estimate →
Prices
Each in the currency that store quoted — not converted: the gap between two rows is the publisher's pricing, not an exchange rate.
Availability
We put this game to every storefront we collect. A market that answered not sold has told us something about the game; a market we never asked has not, and the two are never drawn the same.
Discounts
Every price cut of more than 20% we have observed, in each market that quoted one, with this game's chart position on either side of it. These are episodes, not a model: a sale is one event, and one event cannot tell you what the next one will do.
About
Sums Steam only; PlayStation, Nintendo publish no volume signal, so the true total is higher by an unknown amount.
| Store | Price | Audience | Score | Chart | Est. revenue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SteamYou are here | $14.99−70% | 4.6Kreviews | 73% | — | $1.9M |
| $59.99 | 2.3Kratings | 84% | — | not modelled | |
Updates
Build ids and update times come straight from Steam's PICS — the same source SteamDB reads. Patch history grows as we record new builds.
Engagement
Reviews
Themes across 850 recent reviews and how positive each mention is. A keyword signal, not full sentiment analysis.
Reviews
Clearly I've been spoiled by the more modern tactical turn-based games with their build flexibility and quality-of-life features, not to mention the pacing for a modern (busy) gamer. This feels sluggish and tedious as all hell. I hear the original didn't have the staggered level capping this remake has... Makes sense. It's somehow impressive to make the character level progress simultaneously feel restrictive and tedious. I also hear the weird card mechanic that feels inconsequential was also an "addition" to the Reborn... Makes sense. Almost like the original could have been better? Some people praise the story, but at least so far (15+ hours) the exposition is nothing but painfully generic "kingdoms at war and kids save the day" and tedious to slog through. My enthusiasm for Tactics Ogre: Reborn plummets with every passing battle. I'll give this one more long night to convince me it's worth playing.
Media
Related
Related
Price dynamics, follower growth, revenue and sales trajectories with interactive tooltips
This and every other Pro feature is free until October 20, 2026. A free account is all it takes.
Related
| Game | Estimated lifetime revenue | Reviews | Review score | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $1.9M | 1.9K | 89% | $34.99 | |
| $1.9M | 3.6K | 68% | $19.99 | |
| $1.9M | 3.5K | 75% | $14.99 | |
| $1.9M | 6.4K | 91% | $19.99 | |
| $1.9M | 3.4K | 98% | $17.49 | |
| $1.9M | 2.4K | 80% | $24.99 |
Related
| Game | Estimated lifetime revenue | Reviews | Review score | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $467.3K | 803 | 82% | $19.99 | |
| $367.9K | 581 | 80% | $19.99 | |
| $59K | 142 | 65% | $14.99 | |
| $9.8K | 22 | 95% | $10.49 | |
| $1.6K | 8 | 88% | $7.49 | |
| $1.5K | 7 | 71% | $7.49 |
14 of 15 markets; the rest we haven't asked for this title, not markets where it is unavailable.
14 on sale1 answered “not sold”0 we did not ask
The 1 “not sold” market is read from the Steam price pass of Aug 26: that day the store answered for this game elsewhere and gave no price there. The 14 priced markets are the same rows as the table above — each the latest price we hold, dated here when it is older than that pass. The 0 marked “not asked” were not put to this store at all — either it has no storefront there or we do not collect it yet, and neither is a statement about the game. A refusal is a refusal on one day; a store can list a title again tomorrow.
Reviews, worldwide (the counter carries no country): 1.22/day in the week to Aug 4 → 2.86/day in the week after.
For scale, across Steam · Top Sellers · Brazil over the last 30 days: the 26 chart moves that followed a price cut of more than 20% went a median of 7 places towards #1, and the 2,402 moves with no price cut behind them went 2 away. One store, one chart, one country — it is the only place we have enough observations to say even that.
Prices outside the United States have been collected since 6 August 2026 and chart positions since 19 July 2026, so a cut older than that has no market to compare and a market that joined later has no history yet. Nothing here is converted between currencies.
Genres
Stats
All-time low is the lowest price we've recorded for this game since we started tracking it.
Languages: English*, French, German, Spanish - Spain, Simplified Chinese, Traditional Chinese, Japanese*, Korean*languages with full audio support
| $14.99−70% |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| not modelled |
Matched by title — a reused name can pair the wrong games. * is a critic aggregate. Prices and positions are each store's United States storefront; Epic charts worldwide. Audience and Score too, except Steam's, which is worldwide.
Hours played at review time, across 853 reviews with recorded playtime.
positive critical· bar length = how often the theme comes up
リメイクだが、単純にゲームとしてのバランスが悪化してる、シナリオ上育成出来ない地点で敵は育成前提のステータスをしてるからシニゲー化してる、シナリオクリアしても満足感は無く頭に来るだけ
說實在的 , 與其你出SFC版的檔案也不想要這種什麼重生版 , 後面關卡BOSS都直接一刀秒 , 怎麼玩 !? 製作組有沒有親身下去玩過 ? 道具就只放4個 , 死掉是不用復活石是不是 ? 嫌玩家太閒要一直農$$去買復活石是不是 ? 越後面就是一直在浪費復活石疊屍打法 , 連補血都嫌浪費一回合 , 奧茲 + 奧茲瑪 那裡 (一個是法師秒殺 , 一個是全能物理+魔法秒殺) 你們製作組在那邊打 <無死亡次數> 讓我看看 , 你們製作團隊有沒有去測玩看看 , 不覺得把BOSS改得太強嗎 ? 一刀秒誰能接受 ? 這遊戲就是讓玩家感受到滿滿的惡意 , 無論是關卡地形 . 怪物強度 . 怪物等級總是高過玩家 , 全裝備強化跟沒強化 對他們來說根本沒差別 , 一刀秒就是一刀秒 , 是不是要逼玩家每個都開掛去破關 ? 你們不覺得把怪物強度數值調太高嗎 ?
SFC版はやり込み、運命の輪は未プレイです。 リボーンに何を求めるかにも寄ると思いますが、 当方はSFC版の懐かしさを拠り所に購入しましたので、 同様の思いの方にはお勧めできません。 ■良かった所 ・ボイス有りは臨場感が増しますね。 ・姉さんの「重たさ」が、より鮮明になりましたね。 ■合わなかった所（他の方々と被る所が多くありました） ・ラスボス、強すぎです（当方、初回CルートINでしたが、ギブアップしました） ・レベルキャップによる難易度が、要所要所で上がりすぎている感があり、 難しいというよりは、何か、作業感が増して辛かったです。 ・アロセール無双、ががが ・回復アイテムを投げられないと辛い（HPとダメージと回復のバランスが、とても悪い） ・エレメントチャーム、モア、プリーズ ・固有アイテムを落とさないとか ・雑魚がアニヒレーション使うとか（でも、落とさないし） ・相手は最初からバフカード4枚装備とか 総括としては、 「遊んでいる」感よりも「遊ばされている」感を強く感じる作品でした。（残念ッス）
多く言われているように、バフカードは要らない。最悪の改悪です。 レベルキャップも選択出来れば何も問題なかったんでしょうね。 個人的にナイトならショートソード、バーサーカーならフランシスカ、カノプーならスピアなど、 クラスの独自攻撃モーションどこいった...... それがないのがめちゃくちゃショックでしたね… あれがカッコいいのに...... 脳内で再生されますけど見たかったなー ふと思ったのでレビューにておいておきます。 どんなモーションかはYouTubeで見てください。テンション上がりますよｗ
This game is so good - I think a lot of people were hoping for more freedom in their experience with this game and I think the director had a specific vision in mind and square tried very hard to balance the game around that vision. I think this makes for a really awesome experience if you allow yourself to buy in to it but it can be miserable for some people who would rather play their way or maybe have a more relaxed time with the game. I will say, there are a decent amount of mods out there now that change things including removing Union Level and Level Sync if that makes you more inclined to try it out. All in all, it's second only to Final Fantasy Tactics for me in the TRPG genre.
カード拾いを強制させられてテンポがとにかく悪いゲーム
The biggest sin of this remake is that it's just unfun. Battle cards, level cap, skills not carrying over - majority of changes from the (console) original increase the tedium. Difficulty is passable, but ultimately... why bother?
バランス悪すぎ
Pra que usar sistema de evolução por XP se tem limite de level por capitulo? é a mesma coisa de usar uma Ferrari pra andar numa floresta fechada, é o tipo de decisão que me faz questionar os profissionais da industria últimamente. Não é como se não houvessem opções se o objetivo fosse deixar a estratégia mais complexa, afinal, estratégia é analisar as sua opções numa batalha, então novamente se estou talhando as suas opções de gameplay para que vc faça um caminho especifico, PRA QUE ESTRATÉGIA ENTÃO?
Active players
Estimated daily and monthly active players (DAU/MAU) modeled from peak concurrency.
Players by region
Where this game's players are, estimated from review languages.
Players also reviewed
The games this title's players most often review too — audience affinity.