Republic of Jungle

"Oyunu başlatmak için 5-10 oyuncu gerekir" Benim şahsım kendim ve benliğim dışında pek kimsem yok.

[quote][b]Warning: Broken Game/Scam[/b] The developers removed all back-end servers, rendering the game unable to launch. The developer is fully aware, but persists in trying to charge money for this on Steam... hoping to scam gamers out of a few more bucks for a dead game.[/quote] [quote][b]Note: Dead PvP game[/b] This game contained no meaningful single player content. The game cannot launch without the back end servers that the developer shut down. This game cannot be played.[/quote] [quote][url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Furry_fandom][b]Trigger Warning: Furries.[/b][/url] This game contained anthropomorphic animal characters.[/quote] This was a social deduction game... yeah, a ripoff of Mafia/Werewolf, but with furries. It failed hard. This is a dead PvP game. Why did "Republic of Jungle" fail? Time for a video game autopsy. [i]Almost every PvP exclusive game on Steam fails.[/i] Only a tiny proportion of them "go viral". This game failed for many of the same reasons those others fail. The chief of which is the developer thinking that their game will "go viral" without actually creating any reason for it do so. Competition amongst PvP centric games is extreme, and there's only a finite player base to appeal to. This game failed to reach any kind of critical mass and died as a result. Let's go into some of the reasons this particular game failed to appeal to gamers, despite the zero up front cost. This game lacks any meaningful solo content. The developer tried to use other players as a substitute for real work like level design and story, gambling that just because their game exists, it's going to magically pull the entire player base of Counter-Strike 2 over to this failure instead. They lost that unwise gamble. A game with no players and no solo content is a dead game. Developers need to stop relying on players as a substitute for real content, just because they feel creating genuine narrative, level design and so on is "too hard". On the upside, the game does feature customisable controls and resolution, so at least some of the basic, minimum requirements have been met. Unfortunately there's a number of other technical defects and shortcomings which contribute to the game being difficult to recommend to gamers. These flaws make this game fall far short of the professional standards we expect from a modern PC game. Unethically, the developers have left this on the Steam store in an unplayable and broken state. It's the responsibility of the developer to maintain their product, ensure it runs on all modern PCs, or if they determine there's defects and the game doesn't work, they should remove it from sale instead of misleadingly trying to scam gamers into buying knowingly defective products. This is harmful to Steam and to gamers, not just because it's a direct and intentional attempt to scam people, but because it takes a share of the marketing space and visibility away from other games. It's polluting Steam and making it harder for gamers to find genuine games and for genuine indie developers who put months or years into making proper games find an audience. Let's talk about pricing and the actual value this has for gamers. Is this game one of the best of the 140,000+ games on Steam? The developer is deliberately and unethically trying to scam gamers into paying them the cash grab price of $15 USD for a game they know is broken. Don't give it to them.