Obscula

Also... Ich kann die ganzen Negativen Bewertungen nicht verstehen. OK, es ist teilweise ziemlich dunkel, aber macht sowas nicht ein Horrorgame aus? Und zudem sind doch ein paar schockmomente da. im großen umd ganzen, für zwischen durchmal ganz nice.

Look, this was from my understanding this Devs first game. Its not perfect but it was enjoyable. Just a quick tip, the first code is a 3 pin number, the second is a 4 pin number.

este juego es un juego interesasnte hecho especialmente para los tocadores de pitutis morenas que gustan de pichulas y comer penas. Est juego es para gente especialmente especial brizz brizz goon

Die Idee eigentlich gut aber Umsetzung und vor allem Optimierung GRAUENHAFT. Ich frage mich manchmal, warum solche Spiele überhaupt released werden...

Pâle copie de P.T. demo, Obscula n'arrive pas du tout à la cheville de ce jeu. Les problèmes de son, de clics, de textures et de graphismes sont trop nombreux pour apprécier même un minimum les quelques "screamers" présents. Un bel échec, c'est extrêmement décevant.

"Obscula" is a low key asset flip, a bunch of other people's assets assembled badly to make a basic game. Typically this kind of thing is done by amateur developers without sufficient budget, talent and/or staff to do the job of game development professionally. It's then quickly rushed into Steam Direct. And, unsurprisingly, this never results in a product with any quality, interest, or value for gamers. This is a pretty bog standard asset flip, a first person horror adventure game where you wander around the spooky house asset, solve some puzzles, get crappy jumpscares from a ghost asset... yawn. There are thousands of these on Steam (because they're easy for unskilled amateur developers to kitbash out of Unity or Unreal) and they're all terrible. This is slightly worse than most. So the visuals might look halfway decent at first glance, if mismatched looking in places. But that's only because the "developer" is using other people's assets. When a dev is too lazy or untalented to make their own art, they usually aren't capable of competent coding or game design either. That is exactly the case with this mess. The game is quite short, and can be run through in just 30 minutes. The lack of content here makes it hard to suggest it's worth spending the time to add to your library and download. Next is pricing and what value this has for gamers. There's no initial download price, but the developer was charging $3 USD for this. Price barriers, especially on low quality products, can be a direct cause of failure. It seems like a nice gesture for the game to have no up-front cost anymore, but it also tells us that the game wasn't good enough to succeed as a paid product. This is also a bit of a slap in the face to anyone who showed enough questionable judgement to pay money for this... nobody got refunded. Even as a free game, this couldn't find an audience. With a peak of [b]only 8 players[/b], it's clear the Steam community took one look and walked away. They literally couldn't pay people to spend time playing this. Bearing in mind that free games don't add +1 to your game collector count, should you bother adding this to your library and downloading it? Nope. This isn't worth downloading. I didn't pay money, but I still feel ripped off.