No Rest for the Wicked

dog water company fr

pushed the 1.0 release to march 2027 after baiting players to buy the game thinking its 1.0 release is in october 2026, shady practices of the developer, cant be trusted so uninstalling and never playing again, so many games out there that hit 1.0 runescape dragonwilds took less than 2 years to release a 1.0 no rest for the wicked is trash

Very cheap marketing done to lure people buy this game as it was promised to have full launch soon . With no updates in the game for more than 6 months and yet full launch postponed for next year in 2027, which I have a doubt.

Pure scam behavior. Two months of FOMO-baiting to push early sales, and then they hit us with a six-month delay. No wonder everyone's furious.

Literally a scam. Steam should have some policy about these situations, let us refund if the company doesn't deliver as promised, getting people to buy expecting to enjoy it soon then get them all stood up. What if they keep delaying it?

They had a "last chance to get the founders status before 1.0" sale, and then one day after the steam refund window expired, they announced a half year delay. In the span of 13 days. 1.0 also wont be content complete as they intend to finish the world map and story via post launch updates like a live service. Buyer beware.

I have just been apprised of the controversy surrounding CEO Thomas Mahler, and as much as I would like to like this game, I cannot in good conscience support such a hateful bigot. I will be requesting a refund today.

I have over 1,500 hours in this game, even bought a copy for my brother for his birthday, and I was stoked when they finally locked in a 1.0 release date. Then the delay dropped and my anticipation instantly soured. Is it childish to drop a negative review over a delay? Probably. But at this point, my heart is beating purely out of spite, and whatever the real reason is for pushing it back, it doesn't change how annoying it is. Sure, I got my money's worth out of it, so there’s that. But I won't be touching this studio's next early access release, no matter how good it looks. Does the studio give a crap about missing out on one pissed-off gamer's cash? Obviously not, but I'll take whatever petty comfort I can get knowing they aren't getting another dime from me. Look... I think it plays well as a game; but good gameplay doesn't excuse poor planning. If you give me a release date, hitting date is part of the job.