Hazard Hill Idle

Awesome title You click on cars and people walking around the area where you put houses. You start with one house and the next one costs 1000$. After that you continue clicking and building more houses until you can afford the next thing to build which has a much higher cost and it goes up and up. 4 out of the 8 things to build seem to not be unlockable or just not been made yet by Henry. I've played for just about an hour and it was actually kinda fun. Specifically trying to click on every car in time. In case the title changes to the real game name it was [spoiler] "Teen takes 9-inch monster co*k for the first time" [/spoiler] when I found it an hour ago.

‎

für kostenlos insgesamt in ordnung.

很烂，无聊，基本就是傻等 怪不得停售了

нет

☀️

[i]Hazard Hill Idle[/i] is a brainless clicker/incrementer... you know the type, click on stuff to make numbers go up so you can buy stuff to help you click on stuff to make numbers go up so you can buy stuff to... you get the idea. The brainless gameplay is, unsurprisingly, accompanied with an equally low quality technical implementation and poor presentation, resulting in yet another horribly low quality shovelware game that might as well have been done in a web browser. This one has you pretending to build houses... but it's not fully fleshed out, it takes a hugely long time to afford just a basic house, not to mention what you have to go through to get the next biggest building. This feels like someone's half finished afternoon project that got dumped on Steam... and worse, they tried to get gamers to pay real money for this! The graphics here are particularly awful, low poly pixecrap textured garbage, so bad that it actually stands out as one of the worst looking games on Steam. Quite an accomplishment. It's a big contributor to the failure of the game to attract gamers despite having no up-front cost. Gaming is a primarily visual medium, and if developers want to succeed, they must understand that it's not an area for compromise. Let's talk about pricing and the actual value this has for gamers. There's no initial download price, but the developer was charging $7 USD for this. That's delusion. Price barriers, especially on low quality products, can be a direct cause of failure. It seems like a nice gesture for the game to have no up-front cost anymore, but it also tells us that the game wasn't good enough to succeed as a paid product. This is also a bit of a slap in the face to anyone who showed enough questionable judgement to pay money for this... nobody got refunded. Despite having no up-front cost, this failed to appeal to the 130 million+ gamers on Steam. SteamDB shows this peaked at [b]only 3 concurrent players[/b]... this is a dismal public reception. This was so bad they couldn't even give it away. Bearing in mind that free games don't add +1 to your game collector count, should you bother adding this to your library and downloading it? What's the verdict? Nope. This is just impossible to recommend to serious gamers. There's no up front price, but I still feel like I got ripped off.