BlackMill GamesAug 20, 2026$29.99USView on Steam ↗

Gallipoli

Land on the beaches of Gallipoli and fight intense 50-player objective-based battles on the Ottoman Fronts! Experience WW1 trench warfare and desert expeditions as one of 10 historic classes, armed with authentic weaponry. Gallipoli brings the most immersive WW1 FPS battles yet.

Action Strategy Massively Multiplayer Indie Simulation Violent Shooter Historical

Estimated lifetime revenueHigh confidence

$4.4Mgross

$2.7Mlow → high range$7.5M

Net to developer$2.9M

Most likely between $2.7M and $7.5M. On 8 games checked against developer-reported sales, our median error is 11%. How we estimate →

Across 4 stores

Full table →

Store	Price	Score	Revenue · chart
Steam	$29.99	78%	approximately $4.4M
PlayStation	$29.99	79%	—
Xbox	$29.99	82%	—
Epic	$29.99	90%	#24

Matched by title. Prices and chart positions are each store's US storefront; Epic charts worldwide. * critic score.

Compare with other games →

Reviews

What players mention

Themes across 1707 recent reviews and how positive each mention is. A keyword signal, not full sentiment analysis.

Visuals & world

77% · 277

Gameplay & combat

71% · 262

Performance & bugs

65% · 228

Story & quests

Player reviews (1,709)

Recommended4h played5 found helpfulAug 2026

I’ve been a huge fan of this series of WW1 games ever since Tannenberg, through Isonzo, and now Gallipoli. There’s something different here compared to other shooters, in these the immersion is total, with the huge amount of bombardments and screams, the level of historical realism is incredible, you can tell the developers are passionate about history. The fact that you’re in a war and nobody cares if you’ve died five times in a row or are playing badly, it’s not a toxic 5v5 team match, it’s 25v25, it’s almost impossible for anyone to blame you, and losing doesn’t feel particularly frustrating to me, cause I enjoy the gameplay. Also, as I’m from Latin America, unlike with other FPS games, I can play on the US server with a ping of 150/200 without any issues, as it’s a slower-paced game, full of bolt-action rifles. Moving on to Gallipoli, it’s possibly one of the releases that’s received the most negative feedback, things like the sluggish, clunkier movement, changes to the classes, the hand shaking when overwhelmed by enemy fire, or simply the fact that it doesn’t feel like a huge improvement on its predecessor, Isonzo. To be honest, I can’t really judge that yet, but I am enjoying my games of Gallipoli, and I remember that Isonzo also needed a bit of time, updates and so on after its launch. Even if they don’t label it as EA, the devs work in a similar way, continuing development according to a roadmap over several years. If you’re unsure, you could go for Isonzo, which is heavily discounted, whilst if you’re a demanding gamer, already familiar with the franchise, it might be better to wait until they’ve polished it up a bit. [quote] [i] Check out [url=https://store.steampowered.com/curator/44959158-Critiques-Sans-Frontiers/] our curator page [/url] to discover more decent indie games. [/i] [/quote]