Clawed

Played on one of the first days of release. Bought knowing there were issues needing to be addressed but I can see this being a very fun game to play with friends. Happy to support this team in the hopes that the game gets better and better as the devs receive feedback from its customers. My friends and I will be playing this game a fair bit along the way and I'm sure it will improve but it's still enjoyable now anyway. Usual issues are same to what has been stated in other reviews. Lessgoooo

這遊戲評價兩極，我也考慮了才決定玩。 玩之前，我建議大家先做好心理準備，絕對可以幫助到大家。 1) 性價比： 小公司製作，不應與幾千人團隊的 3A 大作比較，以這個價位而言，內容與水準絕對值回票價。 2) 玩法與機制: 類似經典 Biohazard 採用跨區解鎖機制（如要進入藍區，之前要先去綠區找 Key），但公園地圖更大、Key 更多，極度考驗耐心。 3) 硬派地圖設計： 背景為已撤離且設施損壞的主題公園，因此地圖無導航、無明確目的地標記、地圖無法縮放或做標記。 對方向感和記憶力要求較高，「路痴」玩家會較痛苦；我自己有用其他方法，自建地圖標記，Mark低重要位置。 4) 初期探索邏輯： 初期受限於沒有Keycard，路線較固定，若走到路盡頭，就回頭再找；主要路徑多為員工通道，進辦公室在桌上尋找 Keycard 等。 5) 資源機制： 物資很足夠，且會重生，不需要全部撿拾，多到用不完。 6) 存檔機制： 同樣類似Biohazard採用定點電話存檔，需記好電話位置以便存檔。(所以我有用其他程式，記錄地圖重點) 7) 缺點與待優化之處 跑步 Shift 鍵不太順暢，偶爾會有跑不起來的情況。 電話存檔時偶然會打不開存檔位，需要重複數次，這感覺跟公園很接近，設備快壞掉.... 用滑鼠對現場環境物品互動時，有時不太準確。 要分多個存檔點，因為有機會遇bug，就load之前的存檔 總結: 公園整個地圖也很大，高處看也很美麗，要規劃各Key Card次序其實不容易，要讚獨立小團隊的完成度與表現，恐龍迷值得耐心去體驗。期待未來擴充人手後，有更多更新及其他更多優質作品。 ------------------------------------ Reviews for this game are quite mixed, and I hesitated before deciding to give it a try. Before jumping in, I strongly recommend setting the right expectations—it will definitely help you enjoy the experience much more. 1) Value for Money: Made by a small indie studio, so don't compare it to AAA titles developed by thousands of people. For its price point, the content and quality are definitely worth every penny. 2) Gameplay & Mechanics: Similar to classic Resident Evil, it uses a zoned progression system (e.g., you need to visit the Green Zone to find the key for the Blue Zone). However, the park map is much larger with far more keys to collect, which heavily tests your patience. 3) Hardcore Map Design: Set in an evacuated, run-down theme park, the in-game map offers no GPS navigation, no objective markers, and cannot be zoomed or marked. It demands a solid sense of direction and memory, which might be frustrating for players who get lost easily. I personally use other software to rebuild the map and marked key locations. 4) Early-Game Exploration: Early on, progression is restricted by the lack of keycards, making the paths fairly linear. If you hit a dead end, just turn back and keep looking. Most progression routes involve checking staff hallways and searching office desks for keycards. 5) Resource Management: Loot is plentiful and respawns over time. You don't need to hoard everything—there are more than enough resources to go around. 6) Save System: Also reminiscent of Resident Evil, saving is done at fixed payphone locations, so you need to memorize where they are. (Another reason I printed the map and marked them down!) 7) Flaws & Areas for Improvement: Sprinting with the Shift key feels a bit clunky and sometimes fails to trigger. Accessing save slots at payphones occasionally glitches and takes multiple tries (though fittingly, it feels like the park's broken equipment). Mouse interaction with environmental objects can sometimes feel inaccurate. Conclusion: The theme park is massive and looks great from high vantage points. Designing the progression order for all the keycards is no easy task, so kudos to this small indie team for what they've achieved. Dinosaur fans will find it well worth the patience. Looking forward to future updates and more great titles as their team expands!