Block Arena

i love block arena!!!!!

ma che gioco e A ME NON MI FANNO FARE UNA PARTITA

ser o no ser.

fajna gierka ale tyko ze znajomymi bo 2 online to nie

Damn master piece, not a lot of updates but still really good. extremely under rated!!!!!!!!

免费 没中文 没成就 EA停更3年 《方块竞技场》 《方块竞技场》是一款令人兴奋的多人游戏。在游戏中，你会和一群对手一起被传送到一个完全由方块构成的地图里。你每走一步，脚下的方块就会掉落，可供你在地图上行走的区域越来越少。随着地图越来越小，你将不得不进行大胆的跳跃，并战略性地使用你的技能（超级跳跃、冲刺、抓钩），努力让自己成为最后一名站着的玩家！ 《方块竞技场》拥有一个有趣的排名系统，排名从青铜1到黄金3不等，并且会根据玩家的胜率和表现自动调整！ 游戏有多个地图，并且会不断添加新地图，以带来有趣且新鲜的游戏体验。

[quote][b]Note: Dead PvP game[/b] This game contains no meaningful single player content. There's no viably populated servers/active player population. This game cannot be played as intended.[/quote] This is basically a weak 3D ripoff of Snake/Tron but with crappy minecraft graphics (that might be flipped assets). I wonder why this was such a huge failure on Steam? So, "Block Arena" is a dead PvP game. Why did it fail? It's video game autopsy time! [i]Almost every PvP exclusive game on Steam fails.[/i] Only a tiny proportion of them "go viral". This game failed for many of the same reasons those others fail. The chief of which is the developer thinking that their game will "go viral" without actually creating any reason for it do so. Competition amongst PvP centric games is extreme, and there's only a finite player base to appeal to. This game failed to reach any kind of critical mass and died as a result. Let's go into some of the reasons this particular game failed to appeal to gamers, despite the zero up front cost. First and foremost, there's no meaningful single player content. The developer gambled that other players would be an acceptable substitute for adding storytelling, level design etc to the Game. They lost that bet. Without a huge community of players or single player content to add a lasting value to the game, the game dies. Developers must learn that other players are not an acceptable substitute for adding content to a game. The developers abandoned this 5 years and 1 month ago. It will never be completed. This unfinished game is just polluting Steam and making it harder for gamers to find genuinely, completely made games. The features lazy low-polygon voxel "Minecraft"-like "art", making this look like a barely functional 3D game from the 1990s. A lot of amateur developers see Minecraft's success and assume it's because it looks bad, not because it had unique and appealing game mechanics, and they try to emulate the success without understanding it. It also happens to be easy, and doesn't need any proper talent in terms of game development/graphic artists etc. That's why reviewers are faced with so many of these terrible games with confrontingly bad graphics. Developers must learn that Minecraft succeeded despite the bad graphics, not because of them. This game is fairly dated at 5 years old... and even back then it looked old and busted compared to contemporary, professionally made 3D games of the same period. It looked bad then, it looks worse now. Now on to pricing and value for gamers. There's no initial download price, but the developer was charging $5 USD for this. Price barriers, especially on low quality products, can be a direct cause of failure. It seems like a nice gesture for the game to have no up-front cost anymore, but it also tells us that the game wasn't good enough to succeed as a paid product. This is also a bit of a slap in the face to anyone who showed enough questionable judgement to pay money for this... nobody got refunded. In terms of public reception, this failed. There's over 130 million unique gamers visiting Steam every month. SteamDB showed the game peaked at [b]only 14 concurrent players[/b]... this is a dismal public reception. This was so bad they couldn't even give it away. All other issues aside (any of which would disqualify this from being worth your time), this is a game that relies on other players for it to be viable, and because there's not enough players, it's not viable. I can't recommend anyone downloads this, it's basically dead.